Day-43 of the Stanley Cup Playoffs:
INKTIME on RINKTIME Observations and Random thoughts by Chris Madsen:
HISTORY LESSON, PART II: When the Blackhawks and Bruins drop the puck for Game-1 of the Stanely Cup Final tomorrow night in Chicago, it will mark the first time a pair of Original-6 teams will vie for the Cup since 1979 when the Montreal Canadiens upended the New York Rangers.
I’ve had a chance to chat with some pretty staunch Bruins fans since unveiling yesterdays’s history of the Boston franchise and I was pleasantly surprised to hear these words: “I didn’t know that…”
Today, I hope to do the same, and in some small way convey to you the men who had a vision, the details behind each team name, and the players that are part and parcel of two of the most “dyed-in-the-wool” fandoms in all of sports.
TODAY, I CONTINUE WITH THE CHICAGO BLACKHAWKS…Or, SHOULD I SAY “BLACK HAWKS” (details forthcoming): The Hawks are two years younger than the Bruins franchise. Boston grocery tycoon Charles Adams unveiled the “B’s” in 1924 and Chicago was part of what was consider the first “wave” of expansion the National Hockey League would experience two years later.
Apparently, folks in the food industry were influenced by Mr. Adams endeavor, because Chicago’sfirst owner was coffee tycoon Frederic McLaughlin, who outbid grain magnate James E. Norris for the franchise. Others involved during this growth spurt were the Detroit Cougars (now known as the Detroit Red Wings) and the New York Rangers.
However, in sharp contrast to Boston’s approach, Frederic McLaughlin elected to be his club’s Owner AND General Manager and decided to field the first NHL team sporting an all-American-born lineup. However, Mr. McLaughlin was also apparently a very impatient man…he made 18 coaching changes in 18 years.
Mr. McLaughlin’s wish to own a franchise was granted on September 26, 1926…reportedly for a $12,000.00…reportedly, $3,000.00 less than what Charles Adams had to pay to get the Bruins into the League.
THE NAME: Owner Frederic McLaughlin had been a commander with the 333rd Machine Gun Battalion of the 86th Infantry Division during World War I. This Division was nicknamed the “Black Hawk Division”, after a Native American of the Sauk nation, Chief Black Hawk–who sided with the British in the War of 1812.
For many years, the name was spelled “Black Hawks.” In fact, as a kid growing up in Chicago, many items like hats, stickers, etc, would have the spelling as “Black Hawks” while other items would spell it “Blackhawks”. This ambiguity was finally put to rest in 1986 when the club “officially” decided on the one-word version–BLACKHAWKS– based on the spelling found in the original franchise documents.
THE LOGO: This was the first:
| No. | Player | Position | Career | No. retirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glenn Hall | G | 1957–67 | November 20, 1988 |
| 3 | Keith Magnuson 1 | D | 1969–80 | November 12, 2008 |
| Pierre Pilote 1 | D | 1955–68 | November 12, 2008 | |
| 9 | Bobby Hull | LW | 1957–72 | December 18, 1983 |
| 18 | Denis Savard | C | 1980–90, 1995–97 | March 19, 1998 |
| 21 | Stan Mikita | C | 1958–80 | October 19, 1980 |
| 35 | Tony Esposito | G | 1969–84 | November 20, 1988 |
| 99 2 | Wayne Gretzky | C | – | February 6, 2000 [ |
WHY THIS SONG?: “Here Come the Hawks!” is the Official fight song of the Chicago Blackhawks and was written by J. Swayzee, an avid Blackhawks fan. The version you just just heard was produced by the Dick Marx Orchestra and Choir in 1968. And to this day, following each period at the United Center you can hear a spirited version pounded-out by long-time team Organist, Frank Pellico.
THE BUILDINGS: Then…
My sincere “thanks” to ALL who have played their part in Chicago Blackhawks history.
*****
THE NUMBER OF STANLEY CUPS WON BY THE CHICAGO BLACKHAWKS: 4 (1934, 1938, 1961, 2010)
*****
TOMORROW ON INKTIME ON RINKTIME: The prediction for the Stanley Cup Final!
*****
UNTIL THE NEXT TIME WE LACE ‘EM UP AND HIT THE ICE!–Chris Madsen
*****
Chris, you mention Lloyd Pettit in your column, but I was curious if you know anything about the current Blackhawks radio play-by-play announcer. Having listened to a number of broadcasts on satellite radio, there’s a particular quirk (at least to ME it’s a quirk!) in his call which drives me crazy, but maybe it’s perfectly normal and I’m just not accustomed to hearing it in the calls of California-based team’s announcers. When Crawford makes a save, the announcer FREQUENTLY describes it as a butterfly save. I recognize that describing it as such for the radio audience helps them to better envision what exactly has taken place on the ice, and differentiates the save from all other types of saves, but at some point (considering that Crawford is known as a butterfly goaltender to begin with) it becomes extremely redundant. Is it really necessary to describe it that way each and every time?